FREE PREVIEW
|
LOGIN OR SUBSCRIBE NOW TO READ THIS ARTICLE
|
Gibbs v. PrimeLending
|
When an Arkansas couple sued several parties following an apparent instance of escrow fraud, some of the alleged conspirators argued that the use of the conspiracy theory of in personam jurisdiction at the federal level violated state law. A U.S. district court presented the matter to the state supreme court in the form of a certified question. That court found that the conspiracy theory does not violate due process rights.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
|

|
Already a subscriber?
Problems logging in?
Please call 330-659-6101 x 805 or email us for assistance.
|
|