FREE PREVIEW
|
LOGIN OR SUBSCRIBE NOW TO READ THIS ARTICLE
|
Hart v. Ticor Title
|
The Supreme Court of Hawaii recently decided whether a title company had a duty to defend an insured homeowner in a dispute with the state over the state’s claims on the property. The insurer argued that it was not required to defend the insured because no actual claims to the title were being made. The insured disagreed, saying that the potential for a claim was cause for the insurer to step in.
TO READ THE FULL STORY
|

|
Already a subscriber?
Problems logging in?
Please call 330-659-6101 x 805 or email us for assistance.
|
|